Skip to content
Plain English
  • Pricing
  • Why Plain English?
  • 🌟 Watch #500 🌟
    Sign in Sign up
    Plain English

    • Pricing
    • Why Plain English?
    • 🌟 Watch #500 🌟

    Sign in Sign up
    • Pricing
    • Why Plain English?
    • 🌟 Watch #500 🌟
    Sign in Sign up

    Arts & Culture

    A chef controls a gas stove (the best way to cook!). But does he have an vent to the outside?

    Gas, electric, or induction: Which is the best kind of stove?

    Read More
    Charles Schulz drawing one of the early cartoons in 1956.

    On Charles Schulz’s 100th birthday, a tribute to the comic ‘Peanuts’

    Read More
    A man dressed as an elf watching (perhaps) one of these four Christmas movies in English.

    Here are 4 classic Christmas movies in English

    Read More
    When filming a true crime series

    True crime: the ethics of this popular genre of storytelling

    Read More
    The latest hit from Netflix is a true crime series about Jeffrey Dahmer.

    Netflix finds a global hit with true crime series ‘Monster’

    Read More
    A yard sale (or a garage sale or a tag sale) is a sale of household items. It's just one of the things Americans call by different names.

    How what we call things reveals where we’re from: 5 examples

    Read More
    AI generated art

    Artificial intelligence is blurring the line between machine and artist

    Read More
    Look at painting for one hour challenge

    Lessons from staring at a painting for a full hour

    Read More
    Immersive Van Gogh exhibit

    Review: does immersive Van Gogh experience live up to the hype?

    Read More
    • About
      • Why Plain English?
      • Contact
      • Features
    • Resources
      • All Resources
      • Listening
    • Join Plain English
      • Plain English Plus+
      • Starter Membership
      • Forever Free
    ©2023 Plain English.
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us

    Forum Description

    Van Gogh: the verdict. Today I'm going to tell you what JR and I thought of the immersive Van Gogh experience we saw a few weeks ago

    Lesson summary

    Hi there everyone, I'm Jeff; JR is the producer; and you are listening to Plain English lesson number 443. Plain English is where we help you upgrade your English with current events, trending topics, and the occasional rant by yours truly. JR has uploaded the full lesson content to PlainEnglish.com/443. Last Thursday, you heard about the new "immersive" Van Gogh shows. I tried to keep my opinions to myself last week, but this week I'm telling you exactly what I think. In the second half of the lesson, I'll tell you what it means to be "turned off" by something and JR has a song of the week. Let's get going.

    The verdict: Overpriced and inauthentic

    As you learned last Thursday , a number of private companies have developed new ways to display and experience the paintings of famous artists, from the street artist Banksy to Mexican icon Frida Kahlo. But the most common subject of these shows is Van Gogh, and no wonder. The Dutch painter produced over 900 paintings in his lifetime and the images are now all in the public domain. So one frigid night in January, I met JR at the Germania Club building in Chicago to see the "Immersive Van Gogh Exhibit." Our tickets were timed, so we had to arrive at our specified time, 6:30 pm. After checking in, we passed through a set of curtains and walked into the exhibition space. All the lights were out and images were projected on all the walls around us; there was music playing. There was one big room, with long white walls on all sides. But from the first room, there were open doors that led to smaller rooms, also with walls covered in white, also with the exhibit showing in them. The show is on a loop; when we walked in, one show was about to end. So we took a seat in the middle of the room. When the show started again, it was cool seeing familiar images projected on huge walls. There were large columns of mirrors to enhance the immersive effect. Let's start with what I liked. It was a good sensory experience to see familiar paintings and images on such a large canvas. The projections covered all four surrounding walls and, often, the floor. I can definitely understand what people mean when they say they feel "inside" a painting. The images are choreographed to music, so it's an audible experience as well as a visual one. When Van Gogh's famous 1888 painting "Café Terrace at Night" appeared, the music playing was the French song "Je ne regrette rien." It was fun to walk around and get different perspectives on the images. Because they were animated, you could feel the mood change as, for example, the sun came up over golden wheat fields. In the Chicago space, you could enjoy the exhibition from the large front room or you could walk through to other, smaller rooms. This lets you get a more intimate experience with the walls closer to you. JR and I watched a loop in the main room and another in a smaller room. Some people liked to sit on the floor in a corner and just look up; others liked to walk around; others liked to stand or sit in the middle. People were enjoying the space the way they wanted to. And now for the bad. Let's start with the fact that this exhibition looks far better on Instagram than in real life. When you take photos, the images appear to shine off the walls. But in person, the images are washed out. They're like any other projection on a wall: they're just not bright and brilliant. But they do appear that way in your cell phone photos, so, as in so many ways, what appears in Instagram is a filtered version of reality. Second, the loop was 35 minutes total. We got to the end and I said, "Was that really it?" The next thing I said was, "What was that?" There wasn't a story. There wasn't any logic. There was certainly no learning. There was music and images morphing into one another. But if you're listening and asking yourself the question, "What is this exactly?" Well, here's your answer: it isn't anything. It's just big images and music. But now I need to tell you my real objection and that is the abject commercialism of the show. Those of you who've listened for a long time, you know that I don't mind if people make a dollar. If you play by the rules, and if you're not hurting anybody, I say, go for it. But the abject commercialism of this show turned me off . Maybe it's because I'm not used to experiencing art in such a commercial way. But let me tell you what I mean. First of all, JR and I paid $94 for these two tickets. That included a $13 "convenience fee." That permitted us to enter at 6:30 pm on the dot. We could pay more for the flexibility to come two hours before or after. We could pay more to go on a weekend. We could pay more if we wanted to rent—not buy, rent—a plastic cushion to sit on during the show. We could pay more for access to an express entry line or pay even more to access the VIP line—not that anyone was waiting in any of these lines. You could pay extra to have a special date night package where you sit in a semi-private balcony. You could pay for drinks on your way in; you could pay for drinks on your way out. We didn’t do any of that. The absolute cheapest way for two people to experience this 35-minute show was to pay $94. None of that money went to Van Gogh's estate. None of it went to people who study the artist or preserve his works. Now contrast it to the cost of entering some of the best museums in the world. The Art Institute of Chicago costs $25. That's about half. They have 18 original Van Gogh paintings and thousands of works from all over the world, from almost every period of artistic history. The Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam costs 19 euros. The Museum of Modern Art, which has Starry Night in its collection, costs $25. In any of these places, you can spend the full day. You can learn something new. You can get lost in the artwork. You can marvel at the skill. You can compare and contrast. You can wonder about the lives and the places being depicted. You can stare at one piece for half an hour, you skip over what doesn't interest you. Your money is supporting people who preserve this experience for future generations. Or you could pay double, rent a cheap cushion, drink a cocktail, and watch an electronic version of something that's so much better in person.

    See the real thing if you can

    I didn't mean to make this so long, but I feel like I needed to get this off my chest. I'm not an art afficionado. I'm not an art lover, really. But after I saw this "immersive" Van Gogh show, I felt like I had to atone for my sins, so I went to a museum nearby that had a special exhibit of his paintings and those of artists that influenced him. And it just reminded me how real the real thing is and how cheap the "immersive" experience was. Anyway, if you want an Instagrammable experience, absolutely go to one of these shows. But do also go to the real thing if you're ever in a city with a Van Gogh painting.
    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
    Cookie SettingsAccept All
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
    CookieDurationDescription
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
    viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
    Functional
    Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
    Performance
    Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
    Analytics
    Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
    Advertisement
    Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
    Others
    Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
    SAVE & ACCEPT